Support the fact-based journalism you rely on with a donation to Marketplace today. Give Now!

With Keystone XL scrapped, oil companies look for workarounds

Scott Tong Jun 10, 2021
Heard on:
HTML EMBED:
COPY
Miles of unused pipe, prepared for the proposed Keystone XL pipeline, sit in a North Dakota lot in 2014. Andrew Burton/Getty Images

With Keystone XL scrapped, oil companies look for workarounds

Scott Tong Jun 10, 2021
Heard on:
Miles of unused pipe, prepared for the proposed Keystone XL pipeline, sit in a North Dakota lot in 2014. Andrew Burton/Getty Images
HTML EMBED:
COPY

For the past decade or more, you’ve probably been hearing about the controversial Keystone XL pipeline.

It was conceived to carry Canadian crude oil to the U.S., from the province of Alberta down through Montana, South Dakota and Nebraska, where it would join the existing Keystone pipeline. 

Well, a major chapter has ended. Wednesday night, the XL pipeline project was officially canceled by its developer, TC Energy.

Fossil fuel opponents are partying, assuming the oil is now stuck in the ground and can’t get to market.

But it turns out that, as challenging as the oil business is these days, Canadian crude may be finding workarounds.

The crude oil deposits in western Canada are known as “oil sands.” The substance is thick like peanut butter, and it takes a lot of work to extract.

But for oil companies, that’s the easy part.

The headaches they encounter — the “above-ground risks,” as the companies refer to them — are created by politicians, investors, markets. And they’re growing.

Back in 2008, when the Keystone XL pipeline was drawn up, oil companies were flocking to Alberta, where it was supposed to start, said analyst Thomas Liles at Rystad Energy.

“You know we were obviously in a higher oil price environment,” Liles said. “And oil sands economics were pretty lofty at those times.”

But crude prices have cratered twice since then. And pipelines to take oil sands to refineries have met increasing opposition. Not just Keystone XL to the south. There’s another fight over a proposed pipeline from Alberta to Canada’s west coast. 

“It’s still got a lot of opposition, particularly in the Vancouver, British Columbia, area, where it terminates. And there’s a lot of [indigenous people’s] groups that have opposed it,” said Robert Auers, a consultant at Turner, Mason. 

Still, he thinks this pipeline, and a second one, will get approved in the next three years. 

But there’s another risk: Wall Street. Institutional investors worry that with climate rules and electric cars coming, will there be much demand for oil?

“It’s making companies hesitant to invest in new production, and that’s particularly true in western Canada, where these are very long-term investments,” Auers said.

He thinks that for all the challenges, oil sands production will still grow. 

But slowly. 

There’s a lot happening in the world.  Through it all, Marketplace is here for you. 

You rely on Marketplace to break down the world’s events and tell you how it affects you in a fact-based, approachable way. We rely on your financial support to keep making that possible. 

Your donation today powers the independent journalism that you rely on. For just $5/month, you can help sustain Marketplace so we can keep reporting on the things that matter to you.